Should subordinate workers be asked to evaluate their supervisors? [peer reviews]

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, subordinate workers should be asked to evaluate their supervisors, sometimes referred to as “peer reviews.” Now let me explain the details.     

First, peer reviews have many advantages, and surveys also support this fact. Then many companies have already introduced it and achieved positive results: for example, subordinates offer valuable feedback, giving their bosses good insight into their management style and performance. As a result, their feedback can help companies make better decisions about promoting, training, and developing leaders.     

Next, I understand some may have concern that peer reviews might harm supervisors. But, if workers are not happy, companies should ask for their feedback by any means. It is because workers’ dissatisfaction can lead to misunderstandings, low morale, and reduced productivity. On this point, peer reviews offset management’s concerns.     

In this way, peer reviews have pros and cons, depending on whether it encourages efficient leadership. So, we should consider them carefully to find out better corporate strategies. Thank you for your attention. [180 Words Type-B]

feedbackは不可算。