Can Japanese people be free from bias against imports?

This is an interesting topic; depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but come to think of it, it would be important to consider what factors form Japanese people’s bias against imports. Now let me give you two examples.     

First, a common bias is that “some imports are of good quality.” This is often manipulated images, as companies use advertisement and other marketing strategies to create better images for their products, which affects consumer choices. So, encouraging informed choices based on reliable data helps reduce this kind of bias.     

Another bias is the idea that “some imports are of low quality,” often because of a lack of information. For example, if consumers are not informed enough about the origin or quality of imported farm produce, this can lead to negative biases. To combát this, transparent labeling and reliable information, such as “traceability certificate,” can help people make informed choices.     

Therefore, I conclude that we need more accurate and unbiased data on imports to make proper and informed decisions. Thank you for your attention. [181 Words Type-D]

結論が曖昧に見えるが、これで良い。

Should daylight saving time [or DST] be implemented in Japan?

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense. It’s important for any country to try to find the optimal policy, but in my view, Japan should not implement daylight saving time, or DST. Now let me explain the details.     

First, studies have shown that DST harms people’s health by reducing sleep, causing stress and even increasing the risk of heart attacks. As a result, the European Parliament voted to eliminate DST, partly because of health concerns.     

Next, I understand some may argue that DST increases leisure time and boosts the economy, but that’s quite questionable. First, according to scientific calculation, DST doesn’t make daytime longer in low-latitude regions such as Japan. Second, implementing DST takes huge costs. Experts estimate that updating all computer systems for DST would take more than 10 years and cost over $100 billion.           

Therefore, given the disadvantages of DST, I don’t believe that Japan has any compelling reason to adopt it. Instead, Japan should make effective use of flex-time systems to boost the economy. Thank you for your attention. [180 Words Type-P]

How can Japan improve its image?

This is an interesting topic; depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense. Surveys have shown that Japan has a good international image, even in China and South Korea. But in my view, we can take more action given the current situation. Now let me explain the details.     

The first step is to incréase official development assistance, or ODA. It incréases living standards of target countries, create connections, and build trust. Plus, they may also boost Japan’s influence in partner countries.      

Next, the number of tourists to Japan has incréased lately because of the weak yen. So, investment in tourism ínfrastructure, such as enhancing transportations, hotels, and tourist destinations must improve the country’s impression among tourists.      In addition, it is important to tackle domestic issues such as the gender gap and diversity. Japan has faced international criticism for gender inéquity, so achieving these goals will win its reputation and show its commitment to upholding human rights.           

If we work together on these points, Japan can greatly improve its image in the world. Thank you for your attention. [184 Words Type-H]

Is Japan doing enough to ensure its energy security?

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, Japan has made strides over the years, in securing its energy supply. Now let me explain the details.     

First, Japan has made efforts to diversify its oil import sources. Plus, it is developing many renewable energy sources, such as hydrogen, biofuels, and geothermal power to replace fossil fuels. In addition, after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident, it inspected all nuclear facilities and is now promoting renewables, such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power.     

Next, I understand some may argue that challenges remain, such as dependence on nuclear power. I haven’t checked the latest data, but the Ukraine conflict may have raised investment costs and slowed down Japan’s move toward renewable energy. Anyway, Japan has committed to achieving global carbon neutrality, and the public supports it. So, I am positive about the situation.           

Therefore, even though there is still room for improvement, I conclude that Japan is making its best efforts in order to secure its energy supply. Thank you for your attention. [181 Words Type-E]

Is Japan a good role model for the development of other nations? 

Depending on the situation in the target countries, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, Japan is a good role model for the development of other countries in some aspects. Now let me explain some of them.     

First, since the end of World War II, Japan ended its army and focused mainly on economic growth instead of military power. This approach has led to the world’s third-largest GDP and built positive relationships with most Asian countries. It is a model case that investing in the economy can yield more benefits compared to military expansion.     

Next, Japan has achieved rapid economic growth, with the fair distribution of wealth among its citizens. So, there are fewer people living in extreme poverty, compared to other countries. This policy has decreased dissatisfaction among the public and created a cohesive and healthy society.           

Therefore, even though it may be difficult to maintain this advantage in the future, I conclude that its system serves as a model for other countries, while it is important to adapt it to each country’s unique situation. Thank you for your attention. [188 Words Type-L]

Should Japan focus more on relations with other Asian nations?

This is an interesting topic; depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense. It’s important for any country to try to find the optimal policy, but in my view, Japan should not rapidly shift its focus on foreign policy. Now let me explain the details.     

First, Japan is already a crucial part of various Asian regional frameworks, such as ASEAN and APEC, and has made efforts to solve many issues. And they have acknowledged Japan’s commitment. In addition, Japan promotes several kinds of exchanges, such as transferring technology and hosting foreign students.     

Next, I understand some may argue that promoting friendly relations with any other country is always positive, but the current balance of power in Asia are complex. So, any change in foreign policy could upset the status-quo. Thus, Japan should focus on maintaining the current framework.           

What I have said has only outlined the issues: in fact, several other political and diplomatic factors may have a complex impact. So, Japan need to consider them carefully to lay down the optimal policy. Thank you for your attention. [185 Words Type-I]

Should Japan rethink its relationship with the United States?

This is an interesting topic; depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense. It’s important for any country to try to find the optimal policy, but in my view, Japan should not hastily shift its focus on foreign policy. Now let me explain the details.     

First, the US is a close ally of Japan, mainly because of their longstanding military partnership that has maintained peace and security in the Far East. Given the security threats by recent countless missile launched from North Korea, tightening the Japan-US relationship is crucial.     

Next, I understand some may argue that promoting friendly relations with any other country is always positive, but the current balance of power in Asia are complex. So, any change in foreign policy could upset the status-quo. Thus, Japan should maintain the current framework, at least for now.           

What I have said has only outlined the issues: in fact, several other political and diplomatic factors may have a complex impact. So, Japan must carefully consider the international situation to lay down the optimal policy. Thank you for your attention. [185 Word Type-I]

 Is Japan a comfortable country for foreigners to live in? 

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, Japan is a comfortable country for foreigners to live in. Now let me explain the details.     

“Living in Japan” has many advantages: first, Japan is a peaceful country with modern facilities and advanced infrastructure. Plus, Japan supports religious freedom, and its unique culture attracts many foreigners. So, a growing number of people have been living in Japan, which demonstrates its popularity.     

Next, I understand some may argue that some right-wing groups protest against ethnic minorities. But as it is, few people agree with them now. Instead, laws and regulations have put in place to provide better treatment of foreigners. For example, most primary schools provide foreign children with opportunities to receive a primary education. In this way, Japanese society is becoming more open to foreign cultures.     

Therefore, even though there is still room for improvement, such as accepting more refugees, I am happy to conclude that Japan is a hospitable country for foreigners to live in. Thank you for your attention. [180 Words Type-C]

advantage: 利点 privilege: 特権。だが、文中に出てくるとどちらとも取れる時があり注意。

Should Japan allow more immigrants into the country?

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all have a point, but in my view, Japan should allow more immigrants. Now let me explain the details.     

First, immigrants can help alleviate Japan’s labor shortage, especially the suffering of primary industries due to an aging workforce. A labor shortage would stagnate the Japanese economy, resulting in lower tax revenues and a possible collapse of the social system. Therefore, the government already understands the need for a change in immigration policy, and has taken steps to ease entry requirements.     

Next, I understand some may argue that immigration causes cultural conflicts and increases crime. However, Japan has welcomed and greatly benefited from foreign cultures for a century and a half. Moreover, immigrants are not intentionally undermining Japanese society. Rather, many of them value Japanese culture and want to support it. So, I believe that the Japanese people will embrace a multicultural society in the future.           

Therefore, even though there are some concerns, I conclude that Japan should allow more immigrants to maintain a healthy and vibrant society. Thank you for your attention. [184 Words Type-D]

Should Japan seek permanent status in the UN Security Council [or UNSC]?

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, it is not a good idea for Japan to seek permanent status on the UN Security Council, or UNSC. Now let me explain the details.     

First and foremost, this idea goes against Japan’s pacifist policy as stated in the constitution. It is because the UN was set up as a military alliance, and still performs military missions, including peacekeeping operations. So, if Japan were to achieve permanent seat in the UNSC, it must provide military assistance. Nevertheless, this does not align with the opinions of the citizens.     

Next, I understand some may argue that Japan should play greater role in promoting world peace. However, Japan should avoid getting involved in any international conflicts. It is because such involvement may frighten away many foreign investors, leading to Japan’s further decline.

Therefore, I don’t believe Japan should have a permanent seat on the UNSC. Whether or not it has a permanent seat, Japan will contribute to the international community in an honorable manner. Thank you for your attention. [185 Words Type-X]

Japan’s role in UN peace-keeping activities

This is a controversial topic: depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, Japan has contributed its various efforts to UN peace-keeping activities. Now let me explain some of them.     

First, Japan donates billions of dollars to peace-keeping activities every year, which is one of Japan’s most significant international contributions. Besides, Japan has provided peacekeeping units with housing boxes and vehicles, to help rebuild the lives of people. For example, during the recent Ukraine crisis, Japan sent their Self Defense Force to help Ukrainian refugees and complete many tasks.     

Next, Japanese civilians can also participate in peace-keeping efforts as non-military staff for various tasks, such as observing elections and providing medical assistance. These actions improve the quality of life in targeted nations, foster international relationships, and encourage mutual trust and friendship in turn.           

The international community have evaluated Japan’s international contributions I have just mentioned. Even though the Japan’s economy is in decline, I believe Japan can still make honorable contributions to the international community. Thank you for your attention. [181 Words Type-R]

Should Japan Self Defense Forces’ [or JSDF] activities in international PKOs be promoted?

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, while they are important missions of Japan, we should not excessively expand JSDF peacekeeping activities as a rule. Now let me explain the details.     

First, enhancing their PKO activities undermine Japan’s pacifist stance. For example, the relevant law limits JSDF’s activities to regions without warfare, but it is reported that JSDF doesn’t always follow this rule. In this way, increasing the JSDF’s involvement in PKOs may result in a more military-focused approach and lead to participation in wars in turn.     

Next, I understand some may argue that Japan can contribute more to the international community, but as it is, Japan’s economy has stagnated for the past three decades, with no GDP growth, while other OECD countries have achieved steady growth. From this viewpoint, it would be better for Japan to reduce its engagement in PKOs.           

Therefore, given the current situations I have just outlined, I conclude that JSDF must not expand their peacekeeping commitment beyond the current scale. Thank you for your attention. [182 Words Type-P]

Japan’s role in the global economy

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, Japan can have positive roles on the global economy. Now let me explain some of them.     

First, Japan can greatly benefit the global economy by licensing their technology. It is because Japan is known for innovating and creating technologies that can improve efficiency, decrease costs, and increase productivity in various industries including manufacturing, transportation, and telecommunications. Plus, Japan owns many eco-friendly technologies that will be valuable to developing countries facing environmental challenges due to industrial growth. This can help curb climate change in the long run.     

For another example, Japan can promote peaceful development among superpowers such as the US and Asian countries. Currently, these countries are not necessarily on good terms with each other. However, Japan’s successful economy and diplomatic efforts with these countries could help bridge the gap and maximize global economic opportunities.           

Therefore, even though Japan’s economy is in decline, I conclude that it still holds an important role in the global economy. Thank you for your attention. [180 Words Type-R]

Is the granting of international aid to poor countries the only way to help their development?

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, giving aid to poor countries is not the only resolution. Now let me explain the details.     

First, for example, providing agricultural technology and expanding international trade are also benefícial ways to promote their development, as they also need to enhance economic opportunities. That’s why the UN Sustainable Development Goals calls on member countries to give hands to developing countries in many ways.     

Next, I understand some may argue that financial aid can boost the economy more quickly, but the purpose of aid must be economic independency. So, if the target country has a proper plan for economic growth, different forms of aid are also desirable. On the other hand, if their ínfrastructure has been damaged because of war or natural disaster, simple aid, such as money and food, may be the only option.           

Therefore, even though we know that monetary aid works, we should not rush to grant them. Rather, we should consider different forms of support in many cases. Thank you for your attention. [184 Words Type-Q]