電子ペットは本物のペットを代替するか

Will electronic pets replace real pets?

This is an interesting topic; depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, electronic pets, or e-pets, will replace, or at least coexist with real pets. Now let me explain the details.     

E-pets have some advantages: first, they are better suited for urban lifestyle, especially for living in apartments. For example, they don’t make noise, nor urge walks, nor get sick and die. Plus, e-pets with various sensors can track their owners’ health status. In addition, they can inform their masters of upcoming schedules, weather forecasts, and neighborhood deals.     

Next, I understand some may argue that e-pets are not pets but just toys. While it has a point, humans are imaginative by nature. Thus, we can easily form an emotional commitment even to e-pets, not only playing with them. This is a positive thing in many countries with an aging population, such as Japan.           

Therefore, I conclude that we can be optimistic about the possibilities of e-pets and find ways to improve them to make our lives more enjoyable. Thank you for your attention. [185 Words Type-O]

自動運転車の公道走行は許されるべきか

Should self-driving cars be allowed to drive on the roads?

Depending on what we are, and how familiar we are with the topic, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, self-driving cars will become safe enough on the roads in the near future. Now let me explain the details.     

First, self-driving technology will be safer than human driving, because they’re composed of promising modern technologies such as high-speed internet, GPS, sensors, and AI. Humans will make errors, but when advanced robotics are combined with vehicles, they will relieve us from dangerous and tedious driving tasks.     

Next, I understand some may argue that we should not easily trust such newborn technology. While it has a point, experts predict that an aging population will cause labor shortage in most developed countries, which makes self-driving technology more urgent. So, we should believe in the potential of self-driving technology and come together to actively promote it to “a safe level.”           

In conclusion, we can be optimistic about the possibilities of self-driving technology, and look forward to seeing self-driving cars across the world. Thank you for your attention. [180 Words Type-O]

賛否を述べてください:翻訳技術は語学学校の存在意義を薄める

Agree or Disagree: Translation technology is undermining the role of language schools.

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, language schools still have their own value in specific areas, while translation technology is eclipsing their importance. Now let me explain the details.     

First, for beginners studying for primary language skills, translation gadgets and apps are simple and useful resources. For example, they provide quick translations, and understanding simple conversations and reading texts. So, students can learn languages at their own pace, without relying only on traditional methods. As a result, the need for language schools in primary education has gone down.     

But as it is, interpretation needs more than simple word-for-word translating. It needs understanding nuances and cultural complexities. So, mastering a foreign language needs extensive lessons conducted by experts. In this case, schools offer students speaking practice with high-level subjects, and customized support.     

In conclusion, while automatic translation may eclipse language schools to some degree, we can still be positive about the potential of schools and find out ways to enhance them for natural communication. Thank you for your attention. [181 Words Type-O]

involve: 含む > 必要とする

人工知能は学校において教師の役割を代替するか

Agree or disagree: Artificial Intelligence [or AI] can replace teachers in the classroom. 

This is an interesting topic; depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, AI can replace human teachers, at least in primary school classrooms. Now let me explain the details.     

First, AI offers advantages over human teachers, especially for primary education. For example, AI can use a vast number of educational resources, and provide students with a skilled learning experience. Plus, AI can teach patiently, and customize lessons based on each student’s level. This helps improve their academic performance, which is a positive thing for most students.     

Next, not to say replacing them, AI is expected to aid teachers, and bridge the gaps in their teaching skills. On this point, some may have concern that the depopulation will lead to the shortage of skilled teachers. But with AI and robotics, schools can enhance their resources and offer good education to more students despite limited personnel.           

Therefore, while I conclude that AI can partially substitute for teachers, we will depend on the expertise of educators for now. Thank you for your attention. [182 Words Type-O]

業務においてロボットは生物的機能を代替するか

Can robots be a substitute for natural ability in the working world? 

The future is often hard to predict; depending on how familiar we are with this topic, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, robots will substitute for natural ability to a certain extent. Now let me explain some of them.     

First, robots have highly-developed motor skills now. For example, they can precisely control their force, such as holding an egg with five fingers, or walking on snow. So, experts predict that robots will handle nearly half of all jobs, which will lead to a low-cost productivity and boost the economy in turn.     

Next, I understand some may argue that it’s still difficult for robots to replace our senses and complex thinking. But as artificial intelligence has advanced, robots have been dominating in those areas, too. For example, we know that humans can’t beat robots in most board games, and robots can create stunning art.           

In conclusion, we can be optimistic about the potential of robotics replacing natural ability. Challenges remain, but they arise from our limitless expectations of them. Thank you for your attention. [181 Words Type-O]

ロボットの将来的役割

What are the future roles of robots?

The future is often hard to predict; depending on how familiar we are with this topic, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, robots will take on a wide variety of tasks. Now let me explain some of them.     

First, robots now have highly developed motor skills, so they are able to control their motion, such as holding an egg with five fingers or walking on snowy surfaces. So for example, nursing robots assist patients with everyday activities including bathing and using the toilet. For another, combined with AI, agricultural robots such as “farming drones” and “self-driving tractors” have already been introduced and expected to alleviate ongoing labor shortage in agricultural industry.     

In this way, they will gradually replace manual labor in various fields. So, experts predict that robots will handle nearly half of all jobs, which results in a low-cost productivity and boosts the economy in turn.           

Therefore, we can be optimistic about the potential of robotics in general. Challenges remain, but they arise from our limitless expectations of them. Thank you for your attention. [183 Words Type-O]

電気自動車の利点と欠点

The prós and cóns of electric vehicles [or EVs]

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but come to think of it, it is important to assess the pros and cons of promoting electric vehicles, or EVs. Now let me explain the details.     

EVs have many advantages, and many countries are rushing to introduce them. First, EVs can reduce greenhouse gas emissions. While gasoline-powered cars emit carbon dioxide and pollute the air, EVs are one of the most popular eco-friendly options currently available. Next, EVs are economical in the long run. On this point, studies have shown that fuel costs for EVs are about half that of gasoline-powered cars. These are positive aspects of EVs.     

There are always cons to everything: one of them is that EVs are expensive so far. Even the cheapest models cost around twice as much as gasoline cars, making them unaffordable for some people.           

In conclusion, although EVs is a new technology, we can be optimistic about its positive impact on society, and come together to improve EVs for a better future. Thank you for your attention. [181 Words Type-O]

科学の進歩は常に有益か

Is scientífic progress always benefícial? 

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, scientific progress does not always benefit us. Now let me explain the details.     

First, scientific progress has led us to use more and more natural resources. For example, we are aware that gasoline-powered vehicles and pesticides are harmful, yet cannot stop using them. In this way, science has indirectly harmed the environment, such as the air, soil, and water. Through scientific monitoring of the environment, many people are now aware of this.     

Next, I understand some may argue that science itself is harmless to society. While it has a point, most scientific progress is driven by human motives. Today, for example, many colleges conduct many scientific researches with funding from companies. However, this may lead to harmful outcome, such as development of weapons.           

Having said that, the UN Sustainable Development Goal have listed “promoting technology innovation” as one of their key challenges. So, we must come together to achieve the goal, in order to bring happiness to humans. Thank you for your attention. [182 Words Type-G]

スポーツ狩猟は禁止すべきか

Should hunting for sport be banned?

Depending on countries’ historical and cultural background, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, you should not ban it, but instead properly regulate it for sustainability. Now let me explain the details.     

First, sports hunting improves wildlife management by controlling target species’ population. For example, it curbs overgrazing, and prevents diseases from spreading. In this way, hunting can help balance in natural ecosystem, as long as it is properly regulated. Plus, sports hunting can support local cultural traditions and local economies.     

Next, I understand some may argue that sport hunting can be cruel to animals. While it has a point, hunting has always practiced throughout history, so there should be few ethical problems. In addition, without a number of skilled hunters available, humans will lose control of ecosystem, which will harm the local economy in turn.           

Therefore, I conclude that sport hunting should not be banned across the board, and that it should be properly regulated it to balance “fun of the sport” with “ethical and environmental issues.” Thank you for your attention. [180 Words Type-X]

古刹を保護する価値はあるか

Are old temples and shrines worth preserving? 

Depending on how we are interested in this topic, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense. I like to visit ancient temples and shrines during my travels, and believe that many of them are worth preserving. Now let me explain the details.     

First, temples and shrines are important religious places, which is why the locals have made efforts to preserve them. So, we cannot easily undervalue them. Plus, many of them are often popular tourist destinations. In addition, they often form unique ecosystems in urban center, and provide habitats for endangered species.     

Next, I understand some may argue that the preservation by public funds violates the “religious neutrality” stated in the constitution. But their cultural and historical significance are irreplaceable. For example, the Todai-ji Temple was built as a national project, and it is a symbol of national heritage and pride, designated as a “national treasure.”           

On this point, the UN Sustainable Development Goals have also mentioned the importance of preserving cultural heritage. Therefore, we must come together to preserve them as valuable legacies. Thank you for your attention. [182 Words Type-G]

家庭問題を業務問題に優先させるべきか

Should family issues take priority over job issues? 

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, every citizen should prioritize family as a rule. Now let me explain the details.     

First, even though humans can survive without work, they cannot flourish without a family. It is because families form the base of most mammals, including humans, which support our well-being and mental health. On the other hand, studies have shown that the increase in one-person households results in low birthrate and leading to losing national power in turn.    

Next, I understand some may argue that job issues also need attention. Certainly, work-life balance is important in our society today. On this point, proper labor contracts and flexible work arrangements can help find “a happy medium.” This allows us to balance our family and work commitments.     

Therefore, I conclude that family issues should take priority over job issues. While finding the right work-life balance may be challenging, we must recognize the importance of family again, in order to develop a resilient and vibrant society. Thank you for your attention. [181 Words Type-F]

That is because:相手の発言への理由。This is because:自分の意見への理由。It is because:口語。

子供の知能指数(向上)により効果のあるのは遺伝か環境か

Which has a bigger effect on children’s IQ, genetics or environment?

This is an interesting topic; depending on how familiar we are with this topic, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but if I have to give a choice, environmental factor would have a bigger impact in general. Now let me explain the details.     

First, studies have shown that some positive environment, such as early education and good nutrition enhance intellectual growth and can significantly increase IQ scores. Plus, taking pre-IQ tests also helps boost IQ scores. In this way, we can see that the environment has directly impact on children’s IQ.     

Next, I understand some may emphasize the role of genetics over children’s IQ. While no studies exist to directly support this argument, developmental disabilities, for example, can often be detected through IQ. So, genetic illnesses may influence children’s IQ range. But it should be noted that it’s not always a factor.           

Therefore, I conclude that environmental factors usually influence more, because children’s development are more influenced by their surroundings and experiences. But it should be noted that there are some exceptions. Thank you for your attention. [181 Words Type-Z]

カジノ開設の利点は欠点を上回るか

Do the advantages of the casino industry outweigh the disadvantages?

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, the advantages of the casino industry cannot offset its significant disadvantages. Now let me explain the details.     

First, while casinos may bring a quick economic boost to host cities, their future sustainability is uncertain. It is because casino resources often shift their locations. For example, Las Vegas is experiencing a long economic downturn, because American casinos are putting significant resources in Asian locations such as Macau and Singapore. However, they will shift their focus to online platforms anytime soon.     

Next, I understand some may argue that taxing casinos generates significant revenue for the government. However, it’s difficult for governments to accurately monitor and collect taxes from them. Thus, even if casinos flourish in a city for a while, it may not promise more revenue.     

Therefore, given that the casino industry is unstable and unclear, we shouldn’t count heavily on casinos, hoping for huge economic boost. Instead, we should look for other ways to improve the local economy. Thank you for your attention. [181 Words Type-P]

given that: ~だとすると(仮定)、~を考慮すると(根拠提示)の2つの意味がある。

賛否を述べてください:環境汚染により、清浄な環境の喪失を防ぐには既に手遅れである

Agree or disagree: It is too late to prevent the loss of a clean environment due to environmental pollution.

Depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, it’s surely too late to prevent the loss of clean environment. Now let me explain the details.     

First, recent scientific progress has made us pollute the environment. For example, we cannot stop riding gasoline-powered cars, nor using pesticides, even though we are aware of their harmful impact. In this way, since the Industrial Revolution, humans have disrupted the environment, polluting the air, soil, and water.     

Next, I understand some may argue many environmental restoration projects are underway across the world. However, studies have shown that it takes time for them to bear fruits. One concern is the rapid population growth in developing countries without green technology. Another is the US, the greatest resource-consuming country, shows no signs of depopulation.           

Therefore, it may be too late to prevent the loss of a clean environment. But the UN Sustainable Development Goals have listed “protecting the environment” as one of their key challenges. So, we must come together to combát destructive pollution. Thank you for your attention. [183 Words Type-G]