Should “economic” sanctions be used to achieve foreign policy objectives?

Depending on the current global situation, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, economic sanctions can achieve foreign policy objectives in many cases. Now let me explain the details.     

First, using economic sanctions is better than taking arms for most countries. Throughout history, military conflicts have claimed ordinary people and disrupted infrastructure. So, it is ethical and sensible to adopt economic sanctions when diplomatic talks fail. This is why the UN often resolves economic sanctions to achieve their objectives.     

Next, I understand some may argue that economic sanctions often do not work, but once the UN passes resolutions, member countries usually work together to achieve the desired results. As globalization progresses, few countries can survive without international trade. So, economic sanctions can effectively prevent target countries from wrongdoing.           

Therefore, even though economic sanctions are not a panacea, I conclude that we should consider them as feasible diplomatic options in many situations. And I stress again that even economic sanctions should only be used in unavoidable cases, and never be abused. Thank you for your attention. [182 Words Type-C]