Do the pros of having “only one superpower” outweigh the cons?

This is an interesting topic; depending on what we are, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, having “only one superpower” has its disadvantages that cannot be ignored. Now let me explain the details.     

First, “only one superpower” can become an undemocratic form of governance. For example, one expected problem is the concentration of authority, which can lead to corruption, imperialism, and infringement on the public interest. It is hard for such a regime to properly represent citizens, so, such global system may collapse quickly, which may entail long-term conflict.     

Next, even if it were set up, it must be similar to the current UN framework. It is because the world has full of diverse ideologies, religions, and political perspectives, which would ask the “superpower” to grant autonomy to every region. In fact, many empires in history, such as the Islamic, Turkish, and Mongolian, worked well because they gave their regions significant autonomy.           

Therefore, even though “only one superpower” sounds fantastic, I conclude that the pros of having it cannot outweigh the cons. Thank you for your attention. [185 Words Type-N]