Agree or disagree: Surveillance cameras should be installed in all public places.

Depending on the security situation and other national circumstances of countries, the answers may well vary, and they all make sense, but in my view, installing cameras is a good idea unless it violates citizens’ privacy too much. Now let me explain the details.     

First, surveillance cameras can visually deter criminal activities, because anyone can easily recognize the cameras, and their footage can offer convincing crime evidence. In this way, surveillance technology can prevent crime and incréase public safety in turn. Plus, surveillance cameras help cover more areas with less staff. This is important in many developed countries such as Japan, where the aging population is making societies less secure.     

Next, I understand some may argue that the cameras can infringe on citizens’ privacy. Certainly, we must prevent abuse of surveillance technology. Thus, we must have proper guidelines and obtain residents’ explicit consent before installing devices.     

Having said that, finding a balance between the public safety and human rights is an important yet challenging matter. So, we must consider them carefully to find out the optimal approach. Thank you for your attention. [182 Words Type-F]

*balance A with B が最も簡単だが置換はしていない。